Based on the 4x5 lens suggestions blog post that I made a while ago, I got a request to do the same for 8x10. Pretty much the same considerations play out for 8x10, do you want modern or old lenses, light weight for the field or you don't care for the studio, and the subject matter determining your preferred focal length and maximum aperture requirements. I won't repeat myself again, except to say that with 8x10 you should just double your favorite 4x5 focal lengths to get the equivalent. So a normal lens for 8x10 is somewhere between 300mm and 360mm.
Since I'm a field camera user, typically taking my super light weight Ritter 8x10 in a backpack with a few holders, I'm basically looking for the lightest lenses with the largest coverage that won't put pressure on my front standard and break my back. In that respect one manufacturer shines greater than all the others: Fujinon. For whatever reason, perhaps because Fuji was last to the party, the company produced some of the most unusual lenses that combine light weight, small fast shutters, and huge coverage. But if you are in a studio setting and/or working in really dark places such as interiors, dusk, dawn, dense forests, or night photography you might want to consider heavier, faster and often cheaper lenses. So I've put together two sets of lenses that meet the extremes of what someone might want in an 8x10 lens set. Then at the end I've got a section on unusual lenses to consider at the super-wide and super-long focal lengths.
Brand / Name | Focal Length | Max Aperture | Image Circle | Coating | Filter Size | Weight |
Computar | 210mm | 9 | 313mm (actually more) | MC | 52mm | 280g |
Fujinon A | 240mm | 9 | 336mm | MC | 52mm | 225g |
Fujinon C | 300mm | 8.5 | 380mm | MC | 52mm | 250g |
Fujinon A | 360mm | 10 | 504mm | MC | 58mm | 475g |
Fujinon C | 450mm | 11.5 | 486mm | MC | 52mm | 270g |
Fujinon C | 600mm | 12 | 620mm | MC | 67mm | 575g |
This is my favorite set of lenses. You could say my Fujinon A 360/10 is practically glued onto the front of my camera I just take so many images with that lens. Unfortunately, it's also very hard to find and will cost you somewhere around $1,200. One alternative is the G-Claron 355/9 but it weighs 855g and takes a 77mm filter. There is also the lighter Apo-Ronar 360/9 which is usually a barrel but does sometimes show up in a Copal 3. Also if you want more coverage for the 300mm focal length, then the Fujinon A 300/9 with an image circle of 420mm and a weight of 410g is a nice alternative and a tad bit sharper. The cheaper alternative to the Fujinon C 300mm, and easier to find, is the Nikkor M 300mm f9 which is similar in size and aperture but has a smaller image circle at 325mm. Many people also like the G-Claron 305/9 with an image circle of 381mm and a weight of 420g. I should also give a shout-out to the Fujinon W 250/6.7 with lettering on the inside and a 67mm filter ring. While it is only a single coated lens in an older Copal 1 shutter, it usually can be had for $300 or so and it has 398mm of coverage!
To be honest I never take this full complement of lenses out altogether. The Computar 210/9 and the Fujinon A 360/10 suffice 90% of the time. I just don't like shooting super wide and things start to wobble in even the lightest breeze when my field camera is racked out beyond 600mm. All of these lenses have large to insane amounts of coverage, it's really hard to run out of room, and let's face it who wants to accidentally vignette an image when the film cost and processing is setting you back tens of dollars a sheet. None of them are poor performers in terms of sharpness.
Brand / Name | Focal Length | Max Aperture | Image Circle | Coating | Filter Size | Weight |
Fujinon W (Inside Lettering) | 210mm | 5.6 | 352mm | SC | 58mm | 271g |
Fujinon CM-W | 300mm | 5.6 | 412mm | MC | 77mm | 965g |
Schneider G Claron | 355mm | 9 | 444mm | MC | 77mm | 855g |
Nikkor M | 450mm | 9 | 440mm | MC | 67mm | 640g |
Goertz Red Dot Artar | 610mm / 24" | 11 | 518mm | MC | 67mm | 1160g* |
*Lens in brass without shutter. Can be mounted in an Ilex 5 or a Copal 3 shutter.
These lenses are faster, heavier, and have pretty large image circles. On the plus side most of them are fairly easy to find and on the cheaper side. The one exception is the Goertz RDA 24"/11 which is easy to find in a barrel but not so easy to find in a shutter. The Red Dot Artars were produced for a long time, first in brass and then in aluminum. The brass ones are very heavy. If you are going to the trouble of having a barrel mounted I'd go for a later aluminium one. An Ilex 5 will allow the maximum aperture for the lens, but a Copal 3 will shave off 1/3 of a stop. The Copal 3 is newer, has a faster max shutter speed, and is about the same weight as the Ilex 5 Plus it is much easier to find. Just make sure you get the black or silver "wide tooth" versions of the Copal 3 and not a Copal 3S which has a narrower maximum aperture. See my 14x17 lens post for an explanation of the differences. The Fujinon W 210/5.6 has to be the older version with the lettering inside the front element, not a later one with the lettering outside. The newer versions mechanically vignette the lens elements maximum performance so they don't cover 8x10. As it is the old version doesn't have much extra coverage on 8x10 so you need to be careful. Besides the Fujinon CM-W 300/5.6 there is also the similar and easier to find Nikkor W 300/5.6 but it takes 95mm filters and is another 300g heavier.
Brand / Name | Focal Length | Max Aperture | Image Circle | Coating | Filter Size | Weight |
Nikkor SW | 120mm | 8 | 312mm | MC | 77mm | 610g |
Nikkor SW | 150mm | 8 | 400mm | MC | 95mm | 1050g |
Schneider Super-Symmar XL | 150mm | 5.6 | 386mm | MC | 95mm | 740g |
Nikkor T ED | 600mm | 9 | 310mm | MC | 95mm | 1650g |
Nikkor T ED | 800mm | 12 | 310mm | MC | 95mm | 1600g |
Nikkor T ED | 1200mm | 18 | 310mm | MC | 95mm | 1480g |
At the wider end you can use the Nikkor SW 120/8 which just will cover 8x10 head on with no movements. Many 8x10 cameras simply can't handle such compressed bellows. The Nikkor SW 150/8 and Schneider Super-Symmar XL 150/5.6 are beautiful optics and also very wide on 8x10. The Nikkor makes a tele lens with ED glass and several different lens elements that take you from 600mm to 800mm to 1200mm. They cover 8x10 with a very little room for movements.